Home

 

 

 

 

 

Solutions

Akiba Rubinstein, source unknown

White to play and mate in four

Instead of the mundane 1.Ra8 g3 2.hxg3+ Kg4 3.Rf8 h4 4.gxh4 gxh4 5.Kh2 etc. Rubinstein is reputed to have played 1.Rh3+! gxh3+ 2.Kf3 g4+ 3.Kf4 g3 4.hxg3#. Since this mate has been used in numerous old studies (see reader feedback below) we tend to doubt whether it actually occurred over the board.

Novomesky/Siran,D, 2002

White to play and win

This was quite difficult and drove some readers to the verge of a nervous breakdown. After the obvious 1.c7 e2 2.c8Q e1Q White picks up the e4-pawn with 3.Qc4+ Qb4 4.Qc6+ Qb5 (not 4...b5?? 5.Qc2+ Qb3+ 6.Qxb3#) 5.Qxe4+ Qb4. After this most people, human or silicon, would go for 6.Qc6+ Qb5 7.Qe4+ with a draw by perpetual check.

But White has a deadly zugzwang move: 6.Qd3!!

Now Black cannot move his king, and there is no safe checking square for his queen. If the black queen goes to b5 White has 7.Qa3#, and after a move like 6...Qe1 there is 7.Qb3#. Black cannot advance the b-pawn either, because of 6...b5 7.Qc2+ Qb3+ 8.Qxb3#.

So Black has no option but to move a pawn: 6...a6. Now comes the following manoeuvre: 7.Qd7+ Qb5 (remember, 7...b5 leads to 8.Qd1+ Qb3+ 9.Qxb3 mate) 8.Qd4+ Qb4 9.Qd3, and we have the same zugzwang as above. This time Black has to move a g-pawn: 9...g4 We repeat the manoeuvre, but also picking up the g-pawn in the process: 10.Qd7+ Qb5 11.Qxg4+ Qb4 12.Qd7+ Qb5 13.Qd4+ Qb4 14.Qd3. Again the same zugzwang. And thus it goes: 14...g5 15.Qd7+ Qb5 16.Qd4+ Qb4 17.Qd3 g6 18.Qd7+ Qb5 19.Qd4+ Qb4 20.Qd3 g4 21.Qd7+ Qb5 22.Qxg4+ Qb4 23.Qd7+ Qb5 24.Qd4+ Qb4 25.Qd3 g5 26.Qd7+ Qb5 27.Qd4+ Qb4 28.Qd3 g4 29.Qd7+ Qb5 30.Qxg4+ Qb4 31.Qd7+ Qb5 32.Qd4+ Qb4 33.Qd3.

After eight zugzwangs Black has no more free moves and will be mated in 15 moves (e.g. after 33...Qa3+ 34.Qxa3+ etc.). White has successfully won an endgame with a lone queen fighting a queen and seven pawns.

Click here to replay the solutions and all the positions given below
Main puzzle index


Feedback

Edward Winter, Switzerland
Please specify that this item was submitted by Mr Donaldson not to ChessBase but to my column Chess Notes (i.e. C.N. 3214, with a reader's response in C.N. 3222).

We were not aware that the Rubinstein position had appeared Chess Notes – it was sent to us by a third party. There is a new item in Chess Notes (3222) which cites a similar position by J. Márquez in Ruy López, March 1897: wKb3, Rf4, Pa3; Ka5, Pa6, b6, b5; 1 Ra4+, etc. The correspondent Michael McDowell (Westcliff-on-sea, United Kingdom) comments that the problem is number 75B in A.C. White’s book The White Rooks (Stroud, 1910).

Flavio Quintiliano, Sao Paulo, Brazil
The Akiba Rubinstein puzzle contains a known mate sequence, with the Black king on the side rank getting mated by the only White pawn. It is quite popular among club players. The position appears for instance in a study from 1927, but I think it was already known in the 19th century.

P. Farago, Keleti Ujsag 1927

White to play and win

Solution: 1.Ke7 Kg7 2.Ke6 [2.Bf5? g4 3.hxg4 h3 4.Be4 h2 5.Ke6 h1Q 6.Bxh1 Kxg6] 2...Kxg6 3.Bh5+ Kxh5 4.Kf5 g4 5.hxg4 mate.

My favorite study with this kind of mate is the one by A. Kakovin.

A. Kakovin, Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1940

White to play and win

The solution is 1.Rd8 Ba5 2.Rd5 bxa4! 3.Rxa5 b5 4.Kc3 Kb7 5.Kd4! (5.Kb4 Kb6) 5...Kb6 6.Kd5 Kxa5 7.Kc5 b4 8.axb4 mate.

The same idea has been exploited in another study:

J. Fritz, 2. hm Práce, 1950

White to play and win

Solution: 1.Rd8+ Nc8 2.Be6 a6 3.Bxc8 Ba5 4.Bd7+ Ka7 5.b6+ cxb6 6.Bxa4 b5 7.Rd5 bxa4 8.Rxa5 b5 9.Kxe7 Kb6 10.Kd6 Kxa5 11.Kc5 b4 12.axb4 mate.

Markus Bindig, Reinsdorf, Germany
I used a computer on the second problem as suggested. It's actually not that hard to find with Fritz once you've figured out that black gets in Zugzwang. Fritz gives 0.00 as an evaluation for quite a long time, however, that's due to it's horizon problem, as it can't easily calculate 33 moves ahead there. You should include more of those puzzles which allow computer-usage. That saves me from thinking as I dislike doing endgame studies on my own anyway ;)

Dear Markus, for many years I ran a chess puzzle column in a German computer chess magazine. I gave it up a few years ago when Fritz and Co. started solving all nice endgame studies in blinks of an eye and I found myself publishing ever more obscure and excentric problems that computers could not understand. The basic problem was: humans couldn't either. So in this column I'm going to publish attractive material and simply advise people not to use computer -- unless otherwise stated.

Mark Jordan, Bellingham, WA, USA [12. März 2004 03:55]
I solved the second problem with computer help. I was wondering if i was the first:)

Indeed you were, Mark

Alex Averbukh, Ithaca, NY
Wow, I am impressed. I enjoyed last week's problems immensely. Bf7 and g6 idea was very cool and now this little jewel. Keep up the good work.

Victor Trifan, Toronto, Canada
Your website is very well designed, I've found many interesting things on it. But these 'two remarkable studies' are not remarkable at all. Maybe you wanted to encourage those very beginners who just have learned the very basic things of chess. I'm not far away from them, being an amateur; but 'studies' like these will lower, in my opinion, the popularity of your website. People expect interesting stuff, unique information if possible, not mate-in-one 'problems'. So, let's see:

'Problem' #1: 1.Rh3+ gxh3+ 2.Kf3 g4+ 3. Kf4 g3 4.hxg3 mate.

'Study' #2: If 1.c7 e2 2.c8Q e1Q 3.Qc4 mate; or 2...Kb4 3.Qc1, 4.Qe1 and wins. It's regretable that the 'study' was composed to honour such a great chess player as Jan Timman is - he certainly does not deserve this kind of black humor. (The Timman's 50th anniversary was on Dec. 14, 2001, not in 2002, according to the information from Corus tournament's website). Please offer us some quality stuff from now on. Thanks.

IM Vinicius Marques, São Paulo, Brazil
Very nice the study made to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Jan Timman. Well actually i stayed in my home instead of going to pub with some friends after i saw this very interesting diagram and the solution is very beautiful and very interesting as well.

Nevenincs Alkesz, Palinka, Hungary
This was a funny puzzle, I 've found the solution in a few minutes, but I must mention that the Hungarian Artur Havasi composed a miniature with the same kind of queen maneuvre about 100 years ago. Here is it:

A Havasi, Deutsche Schachzeitung 1914

White to play and win

The solution goes like this: 1.h6+ Kxh6 2.Kf6 Qh5 3.Qd3 Qe8 [3...g4 4.Qd2+ Kh7 5.Qc2+ Kh6 6.Qc1+ Kh7 7.Qc7+ leads to mate] 4.Qh3+ Qh5 5.Qf5 d3 [5...g4 6.Qf4+ Kh7 7.Qc7+ as in the the previous line] 6.Qxd3 Qe8 7.Qh3+ Qh5 8.Qf5 d4 9.Qd3 Qe8 10.Qh3+ Qh5 11.Qf5 d3 12.Qxd3 Qe8 13.Qh3+ Qh5 14.Qf5 for the last time and black has no useful move left, mate will soon be delivered! I think this is as elegant as your puzzle.

James Leibert, Sydney, Australia
The trick is the zugzwang manoeuvre Qd7+ ...Qb5 Qd4+ ...Qd4 Qd3! after which Black is forced to move a pawn to the vulnerable g4 square and White repeats the recipe until there are no more pawns and White must play ...b5 when mate can be forced as the b5 escape square is blocked. Fritz couldn't see it after a lot of thought, but I noticed that the quiet move 6.Qd3! didn't actually lose.

Srinath, Pune, India
I was familiar with the first problem. A beauty, undoubtedly. But the second one steals the show. The beauty lies not so much in the final position, or in the spectacular moves (the lack of them, rather), but in the ingenious concept. How on earth do people come up with something like this, I cannot imagine!

Two suggestions: Can you please publish an article sometime on the thought processes of these weird geniuses who give birth to such puzzles (or is it so damn simple that we "normal" people are the geniuses who cannot think something so lowly? And secondly: four hrs for the repton puzzle was amazing. You should publish an interview with Carlos Adán Bonilla, especially, what does he eat? etc. Won't you please publish the solution for the "very hard level", at least the section with the key.

Murali S. Vajapeyam, Boston, MA, USA
No wonder you say "feel free to use computers". It takes a lot of moves for white to win, and computers have a hard time calculating everything.

Kerem Yunus Camsari, Ankara, Turkey
When one uses computers I think even the toughest puzzles seem, yes not become but seem, a little bit easier to me. Because when you analyse a variant you definetely know that you are not overlooking anything trivial.

Dennis Monokroussos
What are such problems called, mini-monsters? There's a set maneuver that's repeated many times, as in a monster, but the move length is relatively low, at least compared to Blathy's 200+ move compositions.

Mohammed Mansoor Peerbhoy, Pune, India
That's a most amazing problem you've got there (queen + 7 pawns versus queen). And this time, I've managed to solve it (no computers, just my good old chess board, and my buddy Arnold). The second one was awesome. I spent quite some time trying out variations in which the black king lands on a6 (between those 3 queenside pawns), the black queen on b5, and the white queen on c8 mate, but that didn't work. Also, forcing the black king into h6 (behind those 3 king side pawns), doesn't look too feasible. It did seem that there ought to be a killer move (a zwischenzug that renders black helpless), but is not a check. Then I found the solution. Thanks for the amazing puzzle, keep them coming.

Amit, Kulkarni, Minneapolis, US
I had seen the mate in 4 (starting with Rh3+!) ending "Won by Rubinstein" in a chess column in a Russian magazine "Sputnik" that used to be available in India. The author of the chess column was Issac Linder. I have only this information. Does that ring any bell?I will also take this oppurtinity to say that this site is excellent and doing a lot of good to chess.

Valer Eugen Demian, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Extremely exciting puzzles as usual; thank you very much! Computer engines are not useful in the second example because of the horizon effect. You need to find the idea for this "windmill" setup and all those extra pawns on the board (now it makes sense why they are 3 and all are along "g-") are probably rendering the engines useless.

Tomek Rej, Sydney
I solved puzzle two in around 5 minutes. I hadn't seen the puzzle before, but i knew what the idea must as i had seen similar studies. I think the key move to find is Qd3 as it is the perfect waiting move. The rest was easy. Anyway I fed the position into the computer (Fritz 5) and unsurprisingly it couldn't find the win until it was about 5 moves till black has to give up the queen. I think this may be one of those positions which unless the computer can calculate many moves ahead it won't be able to solve, as it would never look for a move like Qd3 and just force the draw.

Misailovic Darko, Paris, France
It was a very nice puzzle, the kind that chess programs like :) I spent a lot of time to find the killing (at first look "very loosing") move Qd3 which open the gates for white. For me, Chessbase is the the chess site. Without it my long night working shifts would be so empty. So please continue your hard work.

Michael Nyman, Tualatin, OR
I solved the Novomesky/Siran,D, 2002 puzzle, pretty easily, really. It's just a matter of shuttling the queen around, gobbling up black's pawns. The key is that if the White queen is on d3, the black queen is stuck on b4, and black has to move the pawns. With a series of checks, the white Queen can always take a pawn and return to d3 such that it's black's move. After black runs out of pawn moves, white wins.

Arnel de Castro
I like your lastest puzzles especially the 2nd puzzle coz it forced me to open my chessboard and do the analysis and after 20 minutes (more or less) I was able to solve it when I found the move 6.Qd3!!! -- the key move. Thank you ChessBase and more power!

Daniel, Arceo, Virginia, USA
I found your puzzles really entertaining. This is my first time to solve one of your puzzles and I'm proud I was able to find the answer at work without the aid of a chess program and a chessboard. I spent like 45 minutes to crack it, by just staring at the diagram.

FM Maxim Devereaux, Hereford, England
I've been staring at the diagram of the Novomesky/Siran study for about ten minutes now, and have managed to solve it without the help of a computer or board. It's not really that hard once you spot the idea. I don't know without checking what my Fritz 6 would make of it, but since 69 ply are required to mate or winning material advantage, and its analysis module seems to stop at 47 ply, I imagine that even given infinite time it cannot solve this in one go from the start position as I did. Score one for the human!

Mathieu Cloutier, Montreal
The solution is based on a ridiculously repetitive zugzwang with the white queen checking on d7 and d4/g4 and zugzwanging black by going to d3. It is not that complicated to see when you have a computer to help you find that there is at most one or two choices here and there and that anyway other moves achieve nothing or loose. It took me about 5 minutes on my computosaurus rex (pentium III) and with Fritz 4.32. Still, quite a tango by the white queen! I would call it "Dirty dancing III: zugzwangs nights"

Susan Polgar
Puzzle 1: Solved in 1.2 second. Puzzle 2: Solved in 14 seconds.

Christos Koutsambelas, Athens
Really exciting that there are problems on which the dry calculation force of the computer proves inadequate.

Philip, Swetz, Flowermound, USA
I am unable to find the solution to the Novomesky/Siran,D, 2002 puzzle located on puzzle page 20. It is driving me crazy! :) Please help.

Brian Stewart, San Jose, CA
White mates in 42! Thankfully, I remembered your advice from a while back, that when you have a multi-pawn puzzle, most of the pawns are just there to mark time. So I eliminated all but the pawns at a7, a5, b6, and e3. Once I solved that, I added in the pawn at e4, then the pawn at g5. After that, the pattern for the two remaining pawns became clear.By the way, I freely admit that I used a computer to find the various mating patterns, but hey, it was your invite after all! Thanks for the good puzzle.

Jerry Slominski, Nebraska
Your puzzle is in error. This is now solution of white to win. You said you'd would have solution posted by 'next week' but that has lapsed. Please validate solutions before posting puzzles.

Richard Price, Mobile, USA
Punctuality is professional, it has been over a week since you asked for the answer to puzzle #20.

Frederic Friedel