 |
A Happy New Year from Pal Benko...
January 1st, 2010 |
|
| Press
Esc or click "Stop" on your browser to stop
the music and "Refresh" to start it. |

... and from your ChessBase team! The positions
below spell H-N-Y - 2-0-1-0 - P-B and are
letter problems composed by the incredible GM
Pal Benko. Each is White to play and mate in three.



You can print out all the three-moves on
the page from this PDF file.
The problems are ideal for anyone recovering from festive
day excesses, lying on the sofa doing
penance for culinary over-indulgence – or simply for
people who like chess puzzles.
A unique puzzle by Noam Elkies
The following problem was submitted by Themis Argirakopoulos
and by Ioannis Georgiadis, both from Athens, Greece, as
well as by Joshua Green, Laurel, MD. Themis wrote: "My
Fritz 9 took more than an hour working but was unable to
solve it. The secret is in the second move." Ioannis
says: "This puzzle is simply impossible for a computer
to solve. Actually I doubt any 'normal' human being would
solve it either."
Noam Elkies, 1991

White to play and draw
The source of the above position is usually given as "The
Internet, 1994", but we have tracked it back to an
email sent by the author to colleagues in mid-November 1991.
In it Noam Elkies wrote: "This is a joke study using
the same K+Q vs. K+P (c/f) battle that I've based some of
my more serious compositions on. In the Queenside jumble
only the Black King and Queen are active; the Knights and
Pawns are immobile and only serve to delay Black's pieces."
When solving this problem it is important to know the theoretical
draw Elkies refers to above.

In the above position, with Black to move, White can draw
because of a stalemate threat: with his king on h8 the pawn
cannot be taken due to stalemate. In the study above, however,
the stalemate resource fails because White has a suicide
move with his knight on a3. So everything looks pretty straighforward:
1.Kh6 Qb3 2.f6 Qd1 3.f7 Qf3 4.Kg7 gives us the position
in the analysis diagram, with the white Na3-c2 move always
available to break the stalemate. So Black should win. There
are a number of permutations of the first three moves, and
computers will tell you: they are all equivalent. Or are
they?
There is a unique point to this study, one that has made
it famous in problem circles – and one that you are
most unlikely to encounter anywhere else. Your task is to
imagine what it might be, and then work out the details
with a (once again) more or less clueless computer. On the
other hand: with the search extending to incredible depths
these days, who knows when a program will come up with the
key moves and a 0.00 evaluation, while giving anything else
a losing score.
About the author

Noam D. Elkies, 43, is an American mathematician and chess
master. At 14 he received a gold medal with perfect score
at the International Mathematical Olympiad, and at 16 he
won the Putnam competition. He graduated as valedictorian
at age 18, in Mathematics and Music, and earned his Ph.D.
at the age of 20 at Harvard University. In 1987 he proved
that an elliptic curve over the rational numbers is supersingular
at infinitely many primes, and in 1988 he disproved Euler's
sum of powers conjecture for fourth powers. His work on
these problems won him recognition and a position as an
associate professor at Harvard in 1990. In 1993, he was
made a full, tenured professor at the age of 26. This made
him the youngest full professor in the history of Harvard,
surpassing the record previously held by Alan Dershowitz
and Lawrence Summers (who were made full professors at age
28).

The winning team from Israel at the World
Problem Solving Championship 2004:
Paz Einat, Ofer Comay, Aharon Hirschenson, Noam Elkies.
Noam Elkies is an accomplished composer and solver of chess
problems. He is also renowned for his knowledge of the connections
between mathematics and music
For the editor of the ChessBase news page
and this Christmas Puzzle section Pal Benko sent two more
letter problems, twins, spelling F-F. Once again both are
mate in three.

It took us a while to figure out why the same position,
moved one row to the right, should make a difference. It
does – both solutions are unique and show little resemblance
to each other. It is at least as interesting as solving
the problems to find out why each solution does not does
not work on the other position.
Frederic Friedel |