 |
He had a dream
December 30, 2004 |
|
| Press
Esc or click "Stop" on your browser to
stop the music and "Refresh" to start it. |
There are logical puzzles that are very difficult, and
some that are trivially easy. But there is one that is
both. At least in my experience. I have told the following
to a substantial number of people. About half look at me
in bafflement and do not know what the question is. The
solution is so obvious to them that they have to see someone
ponder over it for an hour to believe that anyone could
not see the solution instantaneously. Well, here's the
problem, with apologies to those of you who have heard
it before.
Recently
a friend told me the following story about the death
of his grandfather: "My grandparents used to go
to church on Sundays. One day during the sermon, which
was long and dry, my grandfather fell asleep. That week
he had been reading a novel about the French
Revolution and began to dream that he was a rich
aristocrat living in a beautiful chateau in France.
Suddenly
there was a commotion outside. A mob of peasants appeared,
stormed the house, grabbed him and tied him up, dragged
him to the market square, where there was a platform
with a guillotine
set up. My grandfather was led up the stairs, a priest
muttered a few words to him and then his head was placed
in the cradle of the guillotine. A hooded executioner
approached and reached up for the lever that releases
the blade. At that moment my grandfather was snoring
quite loudly, so my grandmother reached out and pinched
him on the back of his neck to wake him up. This was
such a shock to my grandfather that he suffered a heart
attack and died on the spot."
My reaction to the story of my friend: "I don't
believe a word of that. You made it up." Why did
I react in this way, how did I know the story is not
true?
If you belong to the 50% of the population who get it
immediately, try it on other members of your family, on
friends and acquaintances. You will be amazed how thoroughly
stumped some of them can be. Like the world-class chess
player, whom out of politeness we will not identify. We
gave him this puzzle during a Japanese lunch, and he mulled
over it all through the Miso and Sushi. We discussed the
history of the French Revolution and the mechanics
of the guillotine and in particular the height of the
lever. At one stage he made us repeat the puzzle in order
to cleverly identify minor deviations from the original
version ("That way I know that those details are irrelevant!").
As the meal came to an end he was becoming unpleasant and
rude, so we had to tell him the solution. The Elo of our
Super-GM friend is well above 2700.
Incidentally we will not be publishing the solution to
this problem. You will know instantly and with complete
certainty that you have the solution when you find it.
There is no question or debate.
Back to chess. Our readers have been having a lot of,
let us say, fun with John Nunn's proof games. "Proof
Problem #6 was pretty tough," writes Richard Ashwell
of Aurora, IL. "Any harder and I am gonna have to
ask the wife for some extra chess time!" Stuart Wilson
of Woy Woy, Australia, writes: "These problems have
been teaching me the true meaning of Christmas –
I've never said 'Jesus Christ!' so often before."
Steven Monarrez tells us that he tried hard to solve the
problems but failed. "I read somewhere about some
genius who used to read about problems before he went to
bed and let his mind solve them for him while he was asleep.
So I looked at proof game three, and that night I 'saw'
two black knights changing places. Next morning I put up
the pieces on the board and... voila! In less than five
minutes I found the solution!! Like Capablanca: I relate
these facts for whatever deductions the psychologists may
desire to draw!"

Proof game 7: Position after Black’s
8th move
This is another position that will become part of our
Puzzle Contest. You do not need to do anything for the
moment – except try to solve the problem. On January
1st all the contest positions will be given, and that is
when you can start sending in your entries.
Here's an interesting little problem with an idea you
may not have seen before.
Dr. Erich Zepler, Die Schwalbe
1929

White to play and mate in four moves
White would like to play 1.Qd6 and threaten 2.Qe7 mate.
But unfortunately Black has the defence 1...0-0-0 (remember
that in problems castling is always legal unless one can
demonstrate that something in the history of the game must
have destroyed castling rights). So how does White manage
to mate in four?
H. Mattison, Atputa 1930
White to play and win
The problem is that both white bishops are hanging, and
1.Rxd3 Rxe6 is a theoretical draw, as is any R+B vs R that
White may have on the board. So how is he supposed to win?
Once again we urge you to leave your computer out of all
this – except for the proof games, where the beasties
cannot really help. Print out
the positions and carry them around with you, bring out
a board and try to solve the problems all by yourself.
Frederic Friedel
|