Corus Round 6: White is Okay
17.01.2004
– Chessplayers often explain the advantage of the first move by comparing it to having the serve in tennis. Today the aces were serving aces and all four wins came with the white pieces. All four were also scored by the leaders: Adams, Kramnik, Anand, and Topalov moved to +2. Report with photos and analysis here.
 |
 |
Nigel Davies:
A busy persons opening system
Players with interests and commitments away from the chess board often find it difficult to compete against those with more study time. Their opponents come to the board armed with the latest theory and can bash out moves well into the middle game. On this DVD Nigel Davies addresses this issue by demonstrating a simple and easy to learn opening system designed for the busy person.
More information...
|
|
Corus Wijk aan Zee 2004 Round 6
|
66th Wijk aan Zee Tournament
Jan. 10-25
Category 19 (avg. Elo 2702) |
| Round 6 (Saturday, January 17, 2004) |
Adams, Michael |
1-0 |
Bareev, Evgeny |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
1-0 |
Zhang Zhong |
Anand, Viswanathan |
1-0 |
Shirov, Alexei |
Timman, Jan |
½-½ |
Svidler, Peter |
Topalov, Veselin |
1-0 |
Bologan, Viktor |
Sokolov, Ivan |
½-½ |
Van Wely, Loek |
Leko, Peter |
½-½ |
Akopian, Vladimir |
| |

The Open, then the C, B, and A groups all in the same hall.
In classical chess, as opposed to rapid and blitz, having the white pieces
gives you much better chances of winning a game than having black. The stronger
the players, the bigger the relative advantage of having the first move. The
other number that rises with Elo is the percentage of draws, unfortunately.
Among the 2600 crowd white wins run almost two to one over black, but draws
hit 65% in 2003 at the top level.
Basically all these number reflect what we already know. Winning a chess game
requires a mistake and the top players don't make many mistakes. Another consideration
is that since drawing with black is considered a minor victory you regularly
see draws when black is slightly better and would likely play on in the same
position with white.
After adding four more in round six, wins by white are over four to one over
black in Wijk aan Zee's A group, although draws are still at the usual 65%.
The white factor may work out in Kramnik's favor down the home stretch. The
pairings give him the first move against rivals Anand, Topalov, and Leko. Anand
has black against his co-leaders (and already had black against Leko and Svidler,
ouch!).

Bareev and Adams preparing for a short day at work. 1-0 in 25.
Going into the round the leaders knew they had to push hard with the first
move, especially since they all outrated their opponents. It made for a day
of thrilling, hard-fought games. Adams was the first to hit the media room with
a full point in his hand. Bareev blundered a pawn to a fairly simple fork and
resigned in disgust on move 25. Topolov out-dueled Bologan in a sharp game to
keep pace.
Longer grinds were required for Kramnik and Anand to beat Zhang and Shirov,
respectively. Kramnik's inexorable win has the look of a work of art. He will
simply not be denied. Anand and Shirov swapped and swapped until they both got
what they wanted. Shirov had a theoretically drawn endgame and Anand had excellent
winning chances. As so often happens, practical chances beat theory hands down.

The Maestro: Anand limbers up before beating Shirov.
Leko was the only "white leader" who couldn't keep the pace. He was
held to a tough draw by Akopian. The audience was denied good chance for a second
celebration day when Timman agreed to a draw against Svidler in an endgame that
was very close to winning for the Dutchman. Timman had lost his previous two
whites so maybe he figured this was good enough. Call it karma for Svidler,
who resigned in a drawn position against Kramnik in round four. In yet another
wild game the rivalry match-up between Sokolov and van Wely ended in a draw
after both sides missed wins.

A battle of heavyweights. Timman could have pressed for a win over Svidler.
The field is starting to stretch and none of the leaders meet tomorrow either.
But they all have black, so anything can happen. Will the underdogs charge the
net against the big dogs or be content with serve-and-volley draws?
Adams-Bareev
after 24...gxf6
Let's start with an easy one. Bareev recaptured with the
wrong piece on move 23 and now he finds out why. It shouldn't take you
long to find 25.Rxe6! and Bareev resigned on the spot instead of
playing a lost endgame.
25.Rxe6 Kg7 (25...fxe6 26.Bxe6+ Kf8 27.Bxc8) 26.Re7
|
|
Sokolov-van
Wely after 32...Bxb1
Your eyes do not deceive you, Black is up a rook for two
pawns. Yes, those pawns are dangerous passers, and it seems that both
players were too distracted by them to notice that Black's king is a far
bigger issue. The game ended in an exciting draw on move 46 after 33.d6
Qf8. White's pawns and threats on the dark squares created a dynamic
equilibrium.
Sokolov could have won immediately in the diagram by preempting
Black's defense of g7 with 33.Bh6! Black has no way to cover both e5 and
f6 that doesn't lose major material.
33...Qb8+ 34.d6 Rxf2 35.Qe5 f6 36.Qe7 and there is no
perpetual even if Black gives up his rook.
|
Anand-Shirov
after 40.a4
I was delighted when this theoretical endgame came up
and I'm sure the ChessBase boys will be too. (Shirov might be less delighted.)
I got to make use of one of the new ChessBase toys. Black went in for
a drawn ending, but having to find the right move on the last move of
the time control was too much for even an endgame wizard like Shirov.
Those of us who have the spiffy new ChessBase
Endgame Turbo DVDs could play the cruel game of seeing if the super-GMs
could find the computer-perfect moves.
Shirov
slipped from the narrow path here when the gigantic six-man tablebases
in Endgame Turbo say that Black has six moves to draw. Shirov's 40...Rb4
was not one of them. (Rook to g5, g7, or g8 or king to e7, f7, or g5 if
you're interested. Keeping the white king trapped on the h-file is the
common denominator.) Of course finding one drawing move doesn't mean you'll
find the next 20 or 30.
After that Anand was relentless. He didn't play perfectly
but he never let the win slip away. A pity Shirov had to make such a critical
decision on move 40. Still, these endgames are terribly hard to defend
under the best circumstances.
How important are tablebases to the endgame play of chess
engines? Using Fritz 8 on my laptop which unlike my desktop doesn't
have the space for a few dozen gigabytes of tablebases unless I delete
all my Caetano Veloso
Vorbis files and run DOS 1.2 it evaluates the drawing moves
and most of the losing moves with the same +2.44 score. That's with most
of the five-man tablebases but not the critical six-man R+2 pawns vs R
database that weighs in at 4.35 GB. I guess I could always run it off
the DVD directly...
Running these games through Deep Fritz 8 had an amusing
side-effect in this game. Usually this is a handy and quick way to check
all the games for blunders, but when Fritz is thinking about tablebase
mates a blunder takes on a whole new meaning. It went about suggesting
30-move line improvements on just about every move of this endgame! (White
could mate two moves faster this way, Black could hold out four moves
longer this way...) I deleted most of these notes before uploading the
games to the round six replay/download
page so it wouldn't take an hour to load if you're on a dial-up connection. |
Mig Greengard
Standings after round six
All the games in PGN (no notes) GM
group A GM group B
GM group C
Schedule (Rest days 12, 16, 21)
| Round 1 (Saturday, January 11,
2004) |
Topalov, Veselin |
½-½ |
Adams, Michael |
Sokolov, Ivan |
½-½ |
Timman, Jan |
Leko, Peter |
½-½ |
Anand, Viswanathan |
Akopian, Vladimir |
1-0 |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
Van Wely, Loek |
½-½ |
Bareev, Evgeny |
Bologan, Viktor |
½-½ |
Zhang Zhong |
Svidler, Peter |
½-½ |
Shirov, Alexei |
| |
|
| Round 2 (Sunday, January 11, 2004) |
| Adams, Michael |
½-½ |
Shirov, Alexei |
Zhang Zhong |
½-½ |
Svidler, Peter |
Bareev, Evgeny |
½-½ |
Bologan, Viktor |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
1-0 |
Van Wely, Loek |
Anand, Viswanathan |
1-0 |
Akopian, Vladimir |
Timman, Jan |
0-1 |
Leko, Peter |
Topalov, Veselin |
½-½ |
Sokolov, Ivan |
| |
|
| Round 3 (Tuesday, January 13,
2004) |
Sokolov, Ivan |
½-½ |
Adams, Michael |
Leko, Peter |
½-½ |
Topalov, Veselin |
Akopian, Vladimir |
½-½ |
Timman, Jan |
Van Wely, Loek |
½-½ |
Anand, Viswanathan |
Bologan, Viktor |
½-½ |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
Svidler, Peter |
1-0 |
Bareev, Evgeny |
Shirov, Alexei |
½-½ |
Zhang Zhong |
| |
|
| Round 4 (Wednesday, January 14,
2004) |
Adams, Michael |
1-0 |
Zhang Zhong |
Bareev, Evgeny |
1-0 |
Shirov, Alexei |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
1-0 |
Svidler, Peter |
Anand, Viswanathan |
½-½ |
Bologan, Viktor |
Timman, Jan |
0-1 |
Van Wely, Loek |
Topalov, Veselin |
1-0 |
Akopian, Vladimir |
Sokolov, Ivan |
½-½ |
Leko, Peter |
| |
|
| Round 5 (Thursday, January 15,
2004) |
Leko, Peter |
½-½ |
Adams, Michael |
Akopian, Vladimir |
1-0 |
Sokolov, Ivan |
Van Wely, Loek |
½-½ |
Topalov, Veselin |
Bologan, Viktor |
0-1 |
Timman, Jan |
Svidler, Peter |
½-½ |
Anand, Viswanathan |
Shirov, Alexei |
½-½ |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
Zhang Zhong |
½-½ |
Bareev, Evgeny |
| |
|
| Round 6 (Saturday, January 17,
2004) |
Adams, Michael |
1-0 |
Bareev, Evgeny |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
1-0 |
Zhang Zhong |
Anand, Viswanathan |
1-0 |
Shirov, Alexei |
Timman, Jan |
½-½ |
Svidler, Peter |
Topalov, Veselin |
1-0 |
Bologan, Viktor |
Sokolov, Ivan |
½-½ |
Van Wely, Loek |
Leko, Peter |
½-½ |
Akopian, Vladimir |
| |
|
| Round 7 (Sunday, January 18, 2004) |
Akopian, Vladimir |
|
Adams, Michael |
Van Wely, Loek |
|
Leko, Peter |
Bologan, Viktor |
|
Sokolov, Ivan |
Svidler, Peter |
|
Topalov, Veselin |
Shirov, Alexei |
|
Timman, Jan |
Zhang Zhong |
|
Anand, Viswanathan |
Bareev, Evgeny |
|
Kramnik, Vladimir |
| Games Report |
|
| Round 8 (Monday, January 19, 2004) |
Adams, Michael |
|
Kramnik, Vladimir |
Anand, Viswanathan |
|
Bareev, Evgeny |
Timman, Jan |
|
Zhang Zhong |
Topalov, Veselin |
|
Shirov, Alexei |
Sokolov, Ivan |
|
Svidler, Peter |
Leko, Peter |
|
Bologan, Viktor |
Akopian, Vladimir |
|
Van Wely, Loek |
| Games Report |
|
| Round 9 (Tuesday, January 20,
2004) |
Van Wely, Loek |
|
Adams, Michael |
Bologan, Viktor |
|
Akopian, Vladimir |
Svidler, Peter |
|
Leko, Peter |
Shirov, Alexei |
|
Sokolov, Ivan |
Zhang Zhong |
|
Topalov, Veselin |
Bareev, Evgeny |
|
Timman, Jan |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
|
Anand, Viswanathan |
| Games Report |
|
| Round 10 (Thursday, January 22,
2004) |
Adams, Michael |
|
Anand, Viswanathan |
Timman, Jan |
|
Kramnik, Vladimir |
Topalov, Veselin |
|
Bareev, Evgeny |
Sokolov, Ivan |
|
Zhang Zhong |
Leko, Peter |
|
Shirov, Alexei |
Akopian, Vladimir |
|
Svidler, Peter |
Van Wely, Loek |
|
Bologan, Viktor |
| Games Report |
|
| Round 11 (Friday, January 23,
2004) |
Bologan, Viktor |
|
Adams, Michael |
Svidler, Peter |
|
Van Wely, Loek |
Shirov, Alexei |
|
Akopian, Vladimir |
Zhang Zhong |
|
Leko, Peter |
Bareev, Evgeny |
|
Sokolov, Ivan |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
|
Topalov, Veselin |
Anand, Viswanathan |
|
Timman, Jan |
| Games Report |
|
| Round 12 (Saturday, January 24,
2004) |
Adams, Michael |
|
Timman, Jan |
Topalov, Veselin |
|
Anand, Viswanathan |
Sokolov, Ivan |
|
Kramnik, Vladimir |
Leko, Peter |
|
Bareev, Evgeny |
Akopian, Vladimir |
|
Zhang Zhong |
Van Wely, Loek |
|
Shirov, Alexei |
Bologan, Viktor |
|
Svidler, Peter |
| Games Report |
|
| Round 13 (Sunday, January 25,
2004) |
Svidler, Peter |
|
Adams, Michael |
Shirov, Alexei |
|
Bologan, Viktor |
Zhang Zhong |
|
Van Wely, Loek |
Bareev, Evgeny |
|
Akopian, Vladimir |
Kramnik, Vladimir |
|
Leko, Peter |
Anand, Viswanathan |
|
Sokolov, Ivan |
Timman, Jan |
|
Topalov, Veselin |
| Games Report |
|
|
|